Get Essential, free

Jiashengpan

Urad Middle Banner, Bayannur, Inner Mongolia (Langshan-Zhaertaishan belt), China

SEDEXZn-Pb-S (pyrite)

Type
Black shale-hosted stratiform Zn-Pb-pyrite (SEDEX)

Pb-Zn-S deposit of the northern margin of the North China Platform, in carbonaceous black shales and dolostones of the Mesoproterozoic Zhaertaishan Group, 4 km long, 67 orebodies (sulfur 23 %, zinc 4 %, lead 1.4 %). Two leads: unradiogenic (group A) in fine bedded and disseminated sulfides, derived from the old basement, and radiogenic (group B) in late coarse vein sulfides, influenced by the Hercynian granite to the north. Estimated coordinates (about 85 km from Bayan Obo according to Mindat). Indicative coordinates.

206Pb/204Pb isotope ratio, no unit Values of the same system

Standard : Non précisé dans la publication

ValueRangenMineral or matrixSource
15.985 ± 0.09215.929 / 16.25711group A lead sulfides (colloform and disseminated pyrite, galena, sphalerite)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 11 samples, Table 1. Unradiogenic lead. Some sample numbers appear in both groups.
Fu et al. (2010), Lead isotope composition of the Jiashengpan lead-zinc-sulfur deposit in…
16.006 ± 0.09615.889 / 16.2249group A lead sulfides (pyrite and galena, 1984 data)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 9 samples, Table 1. Data taken from the 1984 report of Inner Mongolia geological team No. 105, cited in Table 1; method not described.
Fu et al. (2010), Lead isotope composition of the Jiashengpan lead-zinc-sulfur deposit in…
18.4 ± 0.46417.891 / 18.997group B lead sulfides (vein and breccia pyrite, bedded pyrrhotite, sphalerite)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 7 samples, Table 1. Radiogenic lead; pyrrhotite the most radiogenic, near the granite. Some sample numbers appear in both groups.
Fu et al. (2010), Lead isotope composition of the Jiashengpan lead-zinc-sulfur deposit in…
18.133 ± 0.20117.871 / 18.364group B lead sulfides (vein pyrite and pyrrhotite, 1984 data)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 4 samples, Table 1. Data taken from the 1984 report of Inner Mongolia geological team No. 105, cited in Table 1; method not described.
Fu et al. (2010), Lead isotope composition of the Jiashengpan lead-zinc-sulfur deposit in…
16.101 ± 0.18115.934 / 16.4698ore sulfides (pyrite, pyrrhotite, galena)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 8 samples, Table 1, analyses of this study (8 samples), model ages 1.40 to 1.67 Ga. Lead between the mantle and upper-crust curves: a mixture according to the authors. The fourteen Lang and Zhang (1987) analyses are excluded as they overlap the 1984 data entered via Fu et al. (2010). Agulugou Formation carbonaceous slates (whole rock): 17.705/15.533/36.972 and 16.020/15.412/35.973.
Ding et Jiang (2000), Stable isotope study of the Langshan polymetallic mineral district,…

207Pb/204Pb isotope ratio, no unit Values of the same system

Standard : Non précisé dans la publication

ValueRangenMineral or matrixSource
15.387 ± 0.01315.357 / 15.40411group A lead sulfides (colloform and disseminated pyrite, galena, sphalerite)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 11 samples, Table 1. Unradiogenic lead. Some sample numbers appear in both groups.
Fu et al. (2010), Lead isotope composition of the Jiashengpan lead-zinc-sulfur deposit in…
15.338 ± 0.09815.158 / 15.4559group A lead sulfides (pyrite and galena, 1984 data)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 9 samples, Table 1. Data taken from the 1984 report of Inner Mongolia geological team No. 105, cited in Table 1; method not described.
Fu et al. (2010), Lead isotope composition of the Jiashengpan lead-zinc-sulfur deposit in…
15.613 ± 0.04115.565 / 15.6727group B lead sulfides (vein and breccia pyrite, bedded pyrrhotite, sphalerite)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 7 samples, Table 1. Radiogenic lead; pyrrhotite the most radiogenic, near the granite. Some sample numbers appear in both groups.
Fu et al. (2010), Lead isotope composition of the Jiashengpan lead-zinc-sulfur deposit in…
15.542 ± 0.03815.509 / 15.5894group B lead sulfides (vein pyrite and pyrrhotite, 1984 data)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 4 samples, Table 1. Data taken from the 1984 report of Inner Mongolia geological team No. 105, cited in Table 1; method not described.
Fu et al. (2010), Lead isotope composition of the Jiashengpan lead-zinc-sulfur deposit in…
15.416 ± 0.06415.363 / 15.5548ore sulfides (pyrite, pyrrhotite, galena)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 8 samples, Table 1, analyses of this study (8 samples), model ages 1.40 to 1.67 Ga. Lead between the mantle and upper-crust curves: a mixture according to the authors. The fourteen Lang and Zhang (1987) analyses are excluded as they overlap the 1984 data entered via Fu et al. (2010). Agulugou Formation carbonaceous slates (whole rock): 17.705/15.533/36.972 and 16.020/15.412/35.973.
Ding et Jiang (2000), Stable isotope study of the Langshan polymetallic mineral district,…

208Pb/204Pb isotope ratio, no unit Values of the same system

Standard : Non précisé dans la publication

ValueRangenMineral or matrixSource
35.91 ± 0.09335.822 / 36.17811group A lead sulfides (colloform and disseminated pyrite, galena, sphalerite)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 11 samples, Table 1. Unradiogenic lead. Some sample numbers appear in both groups.
Fu et al. (2010), Lead isotope composition of the Jiashengpan lead-zinc-sulfur deposit in…
35.753 ± 0.34835.112 / 36.2719group A lead sulfides (pyrite and galena, 1984 data)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 9 samples, Table 1. Data taken from the 1984 report of Inner Mongolia geological team No. 105, cited in Table 1; method not described.
Fu et al. (2010), Lead isotope composition of the Jiashengpan lead-zinc-sulfur deposit in…
38.335 ± 0.43937.697 / 38.777group B lead sulfides (vein and breccia pyrite, bedded pyrrhotite, sphalerite)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 7 samples, Table 1. Radiogenic lead; pyrrhotite the most radiogenic, near the granite. Some sample numbers appear in both groups.
Fu et al. (2010), Lead isotope composition of the Jiashengpan lead-zinc-sulfur deposit in…
37.803 ± 0.20637.525 / 37.994group B lead sulfides (vein pyrite and pyrrhotite, 1984 data)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 4 samples, Table 1. Data taken from the 1984 report of Inner Mongolia geological team No. 105, cited in Table 1; method not described.
Fu et al. (2010), Lead isotope composition of the Jiashengpan lead-zinc-sulfur deposit in…
36.021 ± 0.20135.815 / 36.4378ore sulfides (pyrite, pyrrhotite, galena)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 8 samples, Table 1, analyses of this study (8 samples), model ages 1.40 to 1.67 Ga. Lead between the mantle and upper-crust curves: a mixture according to the authors. The fourteen Lang and Zhang (1987) analyses are excluded as they overlap the 1984 data entered via Fu et al. (2010). Agulugou Formation carbonaceous slates (whole rock): 17.705/15.533/36.972 and 16.020/15.412/35.973.
Ding et Jiang (2000), Stable isotope study of the Langshan polymetallic mineral district,…

δ34S in ‰ (per mil) Values of the same system

Standard : V-CDT

ValueRangenMineral or matrixSource
23.4 ± 3 ‰17 / 27.9 ‰27sulfides (pyrite, pyrrhotite, sphalerite, galena)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 27 samples, Table 2: 14 pyrites, 7 pyrrhotites, 5 sphalerites, 1 galena; small peak at 24-25 ‰. Crystallised pyrite is generally heavier than colloidal pyrite of the same sample. δ34S decreases from west (Tanyaokou) to east (Jiashengpan) as the ore horizon rises in the sequence.
Ding et Jiang (2000), Stable isotope study of the Langshan polymetallic mineral district,…
20.9 ± 1.8 ‰18.9 / 22.5 ‰3fracture gypsum
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 3 samples, Table 2 (J304-14, JS-1, JS-2). Gypsum of the Agulugou Formation would indicate seawater sulfate of 21.4 to 22.5 ‰ about 1.5 Ga ago.
Ding et Jiang (2000), Stable isotope study of the Langshan polymetallic mineral district,…

δ13C in ‰ (per mil) Values of the same system

Standard : V-PDB

ValueRangenMineral or matrixSource
−7.1 ± 5.2 ‰−13.1 / −3.5 ‰3vein calcite
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 3 samples, Table 3, analyses of this study: vein calcites (J16-6, J82-10, J304-4). Mineralised pyrite-galena vein J82-10 gives -13.1 ‰; organic carbon -29.4 and -26.8 ‰.
Ding et Jiang (2000), Stable isotope study of the Langshan polymetallic mineral district,…
−3.3 ± 2.3 ‰−8 / −1 ‰11host carbonates (marls, dolostones, limestone)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 11 samples, Table 3, analyses of this study: host marls (J8-1-27, J82-182), dolomitic rocks of the Zenglongchang and Agulugou formations (JDB-1, JDB-6, JDB-7), limestone (36-19) and argillo-arenaceous dolostones (5DZ-03 to 5DZ-11). Mineralised carbonates, lighter in C and O than Proterozoic marine carbonates, would reflect a closed or semi-closed basin. The eleven vein dolomites of Lang and Zhang (1987) are not included.
Ding et Jiang (2000), Stable isotope study of the Langshan polymetallic mineral district,…

δ18O in ‰ (per mil) Values of the same system

Standard : V-SMOW

ValueRangenMineral or matrixSource
20.3 ± 1.1 ‰19.5 / 21.6 ‰3vein calcite
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 3 samples, Table 3, analyses of this study: vein calcites (J16-6, J82-10, J304-4). Mineralised pyrite-galena vein J82-10 gives -13.1 ‰; organic carbon -29.4 and -26.8 ‰.
Ding et Jiang (2000), Stable isotope study of the Langshan polymetallic mineral district,…
19 ± 2.1 ‰15 / 22.1 ‰11host carbonates (marls, dolostones, limestone)
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 11 samples, Table 3, analyses of this study: host marls (J8-1-27, J82-182), dolomitic rocks of the Zenglongchang and Agulugou formations (JDB-1, JDB-6, JDB-7), limestone (36-19) and argillo-arenaceous dolostones (5DZ-03 to 5DZ-11). Mineralised carbonates, lighter in C and O than Proterozoic marine carbonates, would reflect a closed or semi-closed basin. The eleven vein dolomites of Lang and Zhang (1987) are not included.
Ding et Jiang (2000), Stable isotope study of the Langshan polymetallic mineral district,…
20.8 ± 1.2 ‰19.7 / 23.1 ‰8vein quartz
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 8 samples, Table 4 (J2-6, J8-1-22, J8-1-31, J104-5, J104-12, J304-4, J304-7, J304-10): the heaviest in the district, close to the host rocks (recrystallisation at low water-rock ratio according to the authors). Siliceous bands: 19.8 and 21.2 ‰.
Ding et Jiang (2000), Stable isotope study of the Langshan polymetallic mineral district,…

δ30Si in ‰ (per mil) Values of the same system

Standard : NBS 28

ValueRangenMineral or matrixSource
0.1 ± 0.3 ‰−0.1 / 0.5 ‰3vein quartz
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 3 samples, Table 4, checked on the image (J2-6, J104-12, J304-7). Marls: 0.2 and -0.1 ‰.
Ding et Jiang (2000), Stable isotope study of the Langshan polymetallic mineral district,…
0.4 ± 0.5 ‰−0.1 / 0.8 ‰3siliceous and chert bands
Mean and standard deviation recalculated from 3 samples, Table 4, checked on the image (J104-20, J304-13, J94-1). Heavy silicon, as in chemically or biochemically precipitated cherts (Ding et al., 1996).
Ding et Jiang (2000), Stable isotope study of the Langshan polymetallic mineral district,…

Deposits of the same type

Cite this page

IsoFind Atlas (2026). Jiashengpan, isotope signatures. https://www.isofind.tech/isotopes/en/deposits/jiashengpan/ (accessed 2026-10-13).

@misc{isofind2026jiashengpanisotopesignatures,
  title = {Jiashengpan, isotope signatures},
  author = {{IsoFind Atlas}},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://www.isofind.tech/isotopes/en/deposits/jiashengpan/},
  note = {Accessed 2026-10-13}
}

Updated : 2026-10-13